home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: kate.ibmpcug.co.uk!sapphire!scollin
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++,comp.os.ms-windows.programmer.misc,comp.programming
- Message-ID: <860@sapphire.win-uk.net>
- References: <4bk4de$qcr$1@mhafn.production.compuserve.com> <4bomut$fkj@news00.btx.dtag.de> <30E55516.40A4@spider.compart.fi><4c747t$t6b@hubcap.clemson.edu>
- Reply-To: scollin@sapphire.win-uk.net (Simon Collings)
- From: scollin@sapphire.win-uk.net (Simon Collings)
- Date: Mon, 01 Jan 1996 18:53:49 GMT
- Subject: Re: Which is better?
-
-
- In article <4c747t$t6b@hubcap.clemson.edu>, Daniel Hyams (dhyams@eng.clemson.edu) writes:
- >Anders Lindh <anders@spider.compart.fi> wrote:
- >>>Re: Which is better?
- >>>I strongly believe in Borland C++.
- >>>But.... perhaps there aren't soooooooo many differences....
- >>
- >>So do I, partly because Visual C++ doesn't run happily on my 486/33 :)
- >>
- >>Anyway, I have a little problem with Borland's C++ 4.0. It refuses to
- >>compile any 32-bit prgrams. Is there something I possibly could do or do
- >>i just have to upgrade to version 4.5 ?
- >>BTW, I use Win95 and have 8mb of ram.
- >
- >I had precisely the same problem running Borland C++ 4.00 under
- >Win95, and went back to Win31 because of it. As far as I know,
- >there is no fix for this, except to upgrade to 4.5, or even
- >4.52.
-
- If you do upgrade your Borland C++ complier, make sure it is to
- v5.0. This version was was promised in December 95, but there is
- no sign of it yet.
-
- Simon
-
- >
- >-----------------------------------------------------------
- >Daniel G. Hyams, author CurveExpert 1.x
- >email: dhyams@eng.clemson.edu
- >phone: (803) 639-4722 (with voicemail)
- >fax: (803) 639-4722
- >
- > visit the CurveExpert home page at
- > http://www.eng.clemson.edu/~dhyams/CurveExpert.html
- >-----------------------------------------------------------
- >
- >
-
- --
- Simon Collings, G4SGI
- Cheltenham, Gloucestershire, ENGLAND
- http://www.ibmpcug.co.uk/~g4sgi/
-
-
-
-